Massachusetts Residents Voice Strong Concerns Over Legalizing Internet Gambling and Its Impact on Society

Concerns About Legalizing Internet Gambling in Massachusetts

A recent survey conducted by Emerson College Polling has unveiled significant concerns among Massachusetts residents regarding the potential legalization of internet gambling, also known as iGaming. This form of gambling would grant users 24/7 access to popular casino games such as blackjack, poker, and slots directly from their smartphones or computers. The data collected between January 13–16, 2026, highlights profound apprehensions about the social implications of iGaming.

Key Findings from the Survey

Over half (56%) of respondents expressed opposition to the legalization of internet gambling, a sentiment echoed even more robustly among older adults, where a staggering 77% opposed the move. The survey revealed that Massachusetts residents are particularly worried about the effects of easy access to gambling on children and teens.

Notably, 81% of participants fear that minors would have easier access to online gambling, while 79% believe that having 24/7 access will lead to increased addiction rates. Many residents feel that Massachusetts already has sufficient gambling options available, including the state lottery, sports betting, and traditional casinos, with 69% advocating for these existing avenues rather than the introduction of iGaming.

Concerns about the potential rise in problem gambling were underscored by 76% of those surveyed, stating that making casino-style gambling available on every smartphone would be detrimental to public health.

Trust Issues Around Regulation

Further insights from the survey indicated a stark lack of trust in the online gaming industry to safeguard users against addiction and fraud. A striking 76% of respondents expressed little to no faith that current measures will effectively prevent underage access to internet casinos. Furthermore, 54% of participants doubted Massachusetts legislators' ability to oversee iGaming responsibly, highlighting a prevailing skepticism regarding regulatory approaches to this new form of gambling.

The personal impacts of gambling were also apparent, with 54% of respondents knowing someone who engages in online gambling, and 26% mentioning they are aware of individuals struggling with gambling addiction.

Broader Societal Impacts

While proponents of legalizing iGaming often focus on the potential tax revenue it could generate, survey respondents conveyed a more complex perspective. Over half of those surveyed were worried that legalizing internet gambling might depress participation in state lottery games, leading to decreased financial aid for local communities.
Moreover, 56% of residents believe that any financial benefits from iGaming would not outweigh the risks of increased addiction and associated family harm, with 61% fearing a public health crisis akin to the opioid epidemic should iGaming be introduced.

A Call for Action

As the debate continues, it remains clear that the Massachusetts public is largely unpersuaded by arguments in favor of legalizing internet gambling. Many feel the move would primarily benefit gambling companies rather than the citizens of the Commonwealth. Residents have indicated they would be less likely to support any legislators who vote in favor of iGaming, signaling a significant demand for caution in how this issue is approached moving forward.

David Nangle, a representative of the coalition against internet gambling—SIGMA (Stop iGaming in Massachusetts)—asserts, "This is not just about gaming; it’s about protecting our children and the fabric of our society. The risks associated with iGaming are too great to ignore."

In conclusion, as Massachusetts navigates the complex landscape of gambling expansion, the feedback from residents suggests a pressing need to balance economic aspirations with the potential consequences for public health and community well-being.