#United States #PLA #Salt Lake City #Strider Technologies #STEM Collaboration

New Insights into U.S.-China STEM Collaboration

A newly released report by Strider Technologies, a leader in strategic intelligence, has unveiled a concerning trend regarding collaborations between U.S. academic institutions and entities linked to China's People's Liberation Army (PLA). The report documents over 100,000 instances of joint research efforts in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) since 2017, with significant implications for U.S. national security.

Strider's comprehensive analysis points to more than 23,000 published studies as a result of this widespread collaboration, which involves over 50 research institutes closely associated with the PLA. These collaborations span critical technology areas, including artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing, aerospace, and other military-relevant technologies like anti-jamming communications and hypersonic vehicle development.

“The implications of these findings are not just research concerns; they touch upon the very fabric of our national defense,” stated Greg Levesque, the CEO and Co-Founder of Strider. “As our universities continue to lead the way in pioneering technologies, they also inadvertently open doors for adversaries to exploit these advancements for military purposes.”

A Collaborative Paradigm Shift

Historically, U.S.-China relations favored collaboration, emphasizing shared scientific and technological progress. However, the landscape has dramatically shifted. Strider's report serves as a wake-up call, highlighting the necessity for universities and research institutions to reconsider their approaches to international partnerships, particularly with entities known to pose national security risks.

The report outlines not only the sheer number of instances of collaboration but also the alarming participation rate across various U.S. states. Research partnerships have involved leading universities and government laboratories, which underscores the pervasive nature of this issue. Furthermore, since the implementation of National Security Presidential Memorandum 33 in 2019, such collaborations, although slightly diminished, have remained unacceptably high.

Levesque noted, “We chose not to name specific institutions to steer the conversation away from blame and towards collective awareness and policy response.” This thoughtful approach aims to foster a unified front in addressing the grey areas of scientific cooperation that could be weaponized against U.S. interests.

Addressing the Risks

The report raises critical questions about the effectiveness of U.S. government attempts to address vulnerabilities in its research ecosystem. Despite policy efforts aimed at reducing such collaborative interactions, the PLA continues to benefit from the innovative capabilities of U.S. scientists and researchers. The collaboration trend not only enables technology transfer but also provides pathways for potential recruitment of U.S. talent to work with China.

With more than 500 U.S. organizations identified as having collaborated on STEM topics with PLA-affiliated research institutes, the challenge lies in reversing a culture that has long supported collaboration as a primary pathway to innovation.

Strider stresses the importance of decisive leadership from university administrators. “It’s imperative that institutions draw a firm line and avoid any research that could facilitate China's military expansion. The stakes have never been higher,” Levesque affirmed.

The Path Forward

As we navigate this complex landscape, Strider’s report serves as both a cautionary tale and a catalyst for action. U.S. institutions must pivot towards responsible research practices that prioritize the safeguarding of national interests while maintaining their commitment to scientific advancement.

In conclusion, the report emphasizes a critical juncture in U.S.-China academic relations, calling for awareness and action to prevent future exploitation of innovative research for military use. The fabric of national security hinges on the choices made today, making clarity in research collaboration a top priority moving forward.