#USA #New York #Forvis Mazars #Corinna Creedon #workplace harassment

Allegations Against Forvis Mazars

In a striking turn of events, Corinna Creedon, a high-achieving executive formerly leading the National Nonprofit Advisory Services practice at Forvis Mazars LLP, has initiated legal proceedings against the accounting giant. Filing a federal lawsuit on October 15, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Creedon brings to light serious claims of sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and retaliatory termination, casting a shadow over Forvis Mazars' purported commitment to workplace equality.

Background of the Case

Creedon's lawsuit, represented by Kalmanson Cohen PLLC, highlights the alleged systemic issues within Forvis Mazars, claiming the organization failed to safeguard her against harassment from a male colleague. After voicing her concerns for over a year, the executive faced retaliation instead of the protection she sought. Eventually, the firm concluded that the colleague’s conduct was intolerable, resulting in his dismissal. However, remarkably, Creedon was simultaneously terminated, a move labeled as a clear act of retaliation.

"This scenario epitomizes the essence of retaliation," stated Randi Cohen, Creedon’s attorney. The case underscores how women in corporate environments, despite their qualifications and contributions, can be subjected to double standards and unfair treatment when speaking out against misconduct.

Instances of Discrimination

The lawsuit asserts that the corporate culture at Forvis Mazars was rife with gender-based inequities, particularly toward women who expressed grievances regarding sexual harassment or bias. Creedon alleges that she was compelled to work for months without a signed contract and pressured to accept a lesser bonus than her male counterparts, further demonstrating the alleged discriminatory treatment she received.

These claims paint a disturbing picture of a workplace where female executives may feel compelled to remain silent, fearing repercussions rather than receiving the support guaranteed by company policies. Creedon's experiences serve as a sobering reminder of the unresolved issues surrounding gender equality in the corporate landscape.

Legal Foundations of the Case

Creedon’s claims are grounded in violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, along with infringements of New York State and City Human Rights Laws, and the New York Whistleblower Protection Act. In addition to seeking redress for the alleged discrepancies in treatment, she aims for a declaratory judgment to nullify restrictive non-compete agreements that have impeded her professional trajectory post-termination.

Despite the firm representing one of the largest accounting and advisory services in the world, the allegations against both Forvis Mazars and key individuals within the firm—Ryan Reiff, Mike Wolfe, and Troy Gilstorf—bring into question the integrity of their leadership and commitment to fostering a safe working environment.

Implications and Responses

As the lawsuit unfolds, the spotlight remains on workplace practices within not just Forvis Mazars but the broader accounting and advisory industry. The case could catalyze discussions on corporate accountability, especially concerning the handling of harassment claims and the support provided for women in the workplace. Creedon’s courage to stand up against her former employer may inspire other victims of workplace misconduct to come forward and seek justice.

The legal proceedings will likely draw significant attention, as women across various sectors observe the implications of this case on future corporate governance and ethics. With the outcome yet to be determined, Creedon’s quest for justice signals a critical moment in the fight against workplace discrimination and harassment. Through her actions, she challenges other organizations to reflect upon their policies and the environments they cultivate for their employees.

In conclusion, the developments of this lawsuit could determine the fate of not only Creedon but also spark broader changes in workplace treatment and protections for women in the business world, making it a case worth watching closely.