#Maryland #NAAiG #iGambling #Baltimore, MD

Maryland's Online Casino Gambling Debate

In a significant shift in public sentiment, a recent statewide survey has revealed that a considerable majority of Maryland voters are against the legalization of online casino gambling, commonly referred to as iGambling. As residents become more informed about the risks and implications associated with iGambling, opposition has surged dramatically.

The Survey Findings

Commissioned by the National Association Against iGaming (NAAiG) and conducted by Lake Research Partners, the poll gathered responses from 650 registered Maryland voters between September 15 and 18, 2025. Initially, the survey indicated that 52% opposed legalization. However, after learning about the nature of iGambling, which offers unrestricted access to casino activities via smartphones at any time of day, disapproval climbed to 60%.

The most striking finding emerged when participants were informed about the risks such as addiction, youth access, and social harm. Following this revelation, 71% expressed opposition to iGambling, with nearly two-thirds indicating strong disapproval. This response underscores a growing awareness and concern among the public regarding the potential consequences of iGambling.

Key Concerns Raised

Voters have articulated several key worries:
1. Addiction Risks: A staggering 57% of respondents voiced apprehension about the inability of iGambling platforms to effectively prevent underage gambling, raising flags about the potential harm to vulnerable demographics.
2. Exploitation of Vulnerable Populations: About 53% expressed concern that large gambling corporations might exploit individuals, particularly those in precarious situations, for profit. This concern is exacerbated by recent lawsuits in Baltimore against prominent sports betting firms for targeting susceptible communities.
3. Community Costs: The survey results mirror those from New Jersey, where the annual social costs linked to iGambling—including problem gambling treatment, homelessness, and increased criminal justice expenses—are estimated to exceed $350 million.

A Growing Movement Against iGambling