#United States #New York City #Consumer Watchdog #Governor Newsom #SB 614

Consumer Watchdog Urges Veto of Dangerous Carbon Pipeline Legislation

In a pivotal move amid New York City's Climate Week, Consumer Watchdog has called upon California Governor Gavin Newsom to veto Senate Bill 614, also known as SB 614 (Stern). This legislation proposes lifting a moratorium on the construction of pipelines designed to transport compressed carbon dioxide from various Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) projects.

The president of Consumer Watchdog, Jamie Court, articulated the urgent need to halt this legislation in a letter addressed to Governor Newsom. He expressed concerns regarding the implications of allowing these pipelines to be constructed without adequate safety measures in place. Specifically, Court highlighted the absence of mandated setbacks from communities with sensitive institutions like hospitals, schools, and daycare centers.

In his correspondence, Court pointed out that this bill not only hurriedly lifts the existing moratorium on these pipelines but also lacks critical safety protocols. He emphasized that the decision on whether to use odorants—which would help alert the public to leaks or ruptures—rests solely with the Fire Marshal. The potential ramifications of a pipeline failure, particularly given the nature of the materials being transported, cannot be understated. An incident involving a carbon pipeline in Satartia, Mississippi, serves as a sobering reminder; a leak there resulted in a plume of carbon dioxide that displaced oxygen, requiring medical attention for numerous individuals and leading to evacuations in excess of 200 people. The event highlighted the life-threatening risks posed by high-pressure carbon dioxide pipelines.

The nature of the oil industry lobby, represented through figures like Virgil Welch from Caliber Strategies, is a significant factor in the ongoing discussions surrounding SB 614. These lobbyists are supportive of CCS initiatives that depend heavily on these pipelines despite the detrimental evidence pointing towards safety failures and environmental justice concerns.

Court argues that climate leadership should denote rejection of precarious carbon pipeline projects aligned with fossil fuel interests. He warned against capitulating to arguments that prioritize corporate convenience over public health and safety. His letter proposed that at the very least, the bill should entail a mandatory setback distance; he advocated for a two-mile buffer zone to protect vulnerable populations.

The stakes are high, as these high-pressure pipelines can easily deteriorate and corrode, especially when carbon dioxide combines with water. The possibility of a catastrophic rupture poses immediate danger to surrounding communities. As such, Community Watchdog implores Governor Newsom to consider the broader impacts of allowing such legislation to pass.

“The risks associated with compressed carbon dioxide pipelines are severe and shouldn't be taken lightly,” states Court. “It is imperative that we ensure the safety of our communities, especially when dealing with technology that has not proven successful on many fronts.”

California stands at a crossroads; with significant attention on climate issues, it is essential for state leaders to champion policies that prioritize safety, sustainability, and community well-being over short-term economic interests of fossil fuel companies. The decision regarding SB 614 will likely influence not only environmental progress but also the welfare of local residents. The pressing concern is not just about legislation, but about ensuring a responsible path toward climate resilience and safety in California, where the implications extend well beyond immediate economic benefits.