The Urgent Need for Policy Support in the mRNA Research Landscape
The realm of mRNA research is standing at a pivotal crossroads, with recent findings indicating that wavering support from policymakers could jeopardize the sector's promising future. A new survey from the Alliance for mRNA Medicines (AMM) reveals a stark warning: cuts to biomedical research funding and the emergence of anti-mRNA policies could halt crucial progress in therapeutic advancements for cancer, rare diseases, and other critical health issues.
A Shifting Landscape
According to the findings, 81% of industry leaders are concerned that such policies could result in the loss of manufacturing, research, and related jobs in the United States, shifting those opportunities to pro-innovation environments abroad, particularly in Europe and Asia. Once celebrated for its groundbreaking role in pandemic response, mRNA technology now holds the potential to radically transform modern medicine—provided there is a strategic commitment from policymakers to support sustained investments and clear regulations.
Recent research highlights how mRNA is evolving from a vaccine platform into a versatile therapeutic engine capable of enabling personalized cancer immunotherapies, targeted treatments for rare genetic disorders, and swift responses to infectious diseases. The strides made in on-site manufacturing, innovative delivery systems, and next-gen RNA designs further underscore the urgency for support in this domain.
“The U.S. has led in the discovery and development of mRNA technologies, creating a sector that has the potential to shape the future of healthcare,” states Clay Alspach, Executive Director at AMM.
“Regrettably, the rise of anti-mRNA policies, such as funding cuts at the National Institutes of Health, directly threatens U.S. jobs related to manufacturing and research, alongside the chance to address the immediate needs of individuals affected by cancer and rare diseases.”
Impact of Disruptive Policies
The survey paints a concerning picture: nearly half (48%) of the mRNA organizations reported having directly felt the impact of recent policy disruptions and funding cuts. Specific challenges included:
- - 54% had to scale back research and development on mRNA,
- - 46% faced budget freezes and reductions,
- - 46% canceled collaborations,
- - 30% initiated hiring freezes or even laid off specialized scientific personnel.
Worryingly,
20% are in the process of relocating their projects, divisions, or even entire companies, particularly moving from the United States to more favorable environments in Europe or Asia. Presently, 66% of mRNA-related roles exist in the U.S., and approximately 45% of these positions are at risk, while
21% of organizations report that all their U.S. jobs could disappear if these hostile policies persist.
Call for Proactive Solutions
Dr. Andy Geall, the Chief Development Officer at Replicate Bioscience, echoes these concerns, asserting that a retreat from mRNA innovations risks forfeiting an entire generation of advancements and intellectual capital.
“This could shift the U.S. from being a leader in mRNA technologies to a nation dependent on foreign innovations for crucial medical advances,” Geall warns.
Survey respondents emphasize that a pro-mRNA agenda must include increased investment in research and regulatory clarity to harness mRNA’s therapeutic promise effectively. By fostering advancements in personalized cancer immunotherapies, treatments for rare diseases, and innovations in infectious disease control, the U.S. can maintain its position in the global biotechnological landscape.
With a worldwide race for leadership in biotechnology heating up, the decisions taken today will significantly influence whether the U.S. can continue its pioneering trajectory or risk becoming reliant on international innovations.
Experts call on Congress and federal agencies to act decisively—preserving American momentum in this field and ensuring the health, security, and prosperity of future generations.
Conclusion
The survey titled
“The mRNA Innovation Ecosystem (U.S.) 2025 Assessment of Economic Impact, Therapeutic Potential & Policy Implications” was conducted in March and April 2025, gathering insights from 106 senior leaders in biopharma, pharmaceuticals, their associated manufacturing organizations, and academic research institutions, mostly with more than ten years of industry experience. In the face of potential policy changes, the message is clear: proactive support is crucial to safeguard the trajectory and potential of mRNA medicine for future generations.