CITES Committee's Findings on Long-Tailed Macaque Breeding Practices Enhances Biomedical Research Potential

Recent Assessment on Long-Tailed Macaque Breeding Practices by CITES



The Standing Committee of CITES, tasked with overseeing the international wildlife trade, recently released an evaluation of animal breeding practices in Cambodia. Published ahead of an important committee meeting, this report outlines the findings of its review, illustrating Cambodia's effective compliance with international standards and regulations.

According to the report, dated November 12, 2025, the Cambodian government was praised for its extensive data provision and commitment to scientific rigor during the assessment process. The report highlighted Cambodia's customs and inspection protocols, noting their seamless integration within a national single window system, which enhances both transparency and efficacy in inspections. This level of organization has garnered appreciation from the international community.

Moreover, the CITES committee recognized Cambodia's willingness to collaborate, emphasizing the nation's dedication to legislative reform, increased traceability, and alignment with CITES procedures. Such moves are pivotal as they not only improve animal welfare standards but also strengthen international trust regarding the management of wildlife resources.

Long-tailed macaques hold significant value in the realm of biomedical research, primarily due to their close genetic and physiological similarities to humans. They are often utilized as models for drug safety testing and other medical applications, making them the most frequently studied nonhuman primates in the pursuit of human health advancements. Research employing these macaques has played a paramount role in fields such as regenerative medicine, immunology, pharmacology, and vaccine development, ultimately impacting millions of lives.

Historically, Cambodia was a predominant supplier of such valuable animal research models to the U.S., but the importation had decreased due to allegations of malpractices propagated by various interest groups. This reduction raised concerns, jeopardizing the progress of U.S. medical research and the potential to develop novel treatments for various ailments.

In response to the findings, Matthew R. Bailey, President of the National Association for Biomedical Research (NABR), expressed optimism, stating, "NABR welcomes the latest report from CITES, affirming that Cambodia is adhering to international laws and requirements. This validation opens doors for obtaining necessary animal research models from Cambodia, thereby significantly benefiting U.S. medical research."

Bailey further thanked Cambodia for its transparency and collaboration throughout this review, indicating NABR's readiness to facilitate communication and partnerships among U.S. researchers and Cambodia. The ongoing collaboration holds promise for an upsurge in animal research capabilities, potentially leading to breakthroughs that could translate into real-world health solutions.

The CITES evaluation underscores the essential balance between wildlife conservation and scientific advancement, presenting a unified front to address global health challenges. As various stakeholders in the biomedical field look toward Cambodia with renewed interest, the implications of this report may pave the way for enhanced strategies in animal research, governed by respect for both ethical standards and necessary scientific progress.

Conclusion


As the biomedical landscape continues to evolve, the role of nonhuman primates, particularly long-tailed macaques, becomes increasingly critical. The latest insights provided by CITES not only bring to light improvements within Cambodia’s breeding practices but also reaffirm a shared responsibility among nations to uphold standards that govern such impactful research. This report serves as a vital reminder of the interconnectedness of global health initiatives, wildlife conservation, and the ethical consideration surrounding the use of animals in research.

Topics Health)

【About Using Articles】

You can freely use the title and article content by linking to the page where the article is posted.
※ Images cannot be used.

【About Links】

Links are free to use.