Allegations of Abuse: Jane Doe 100 Takes Legal Action Against OBGYN and Medical Institutions

Legal Battle Unfolds: Jane Doe 100 vs. Mark Mulholland

In a troubling legal case that has shocked the community, Jane Doe 100 has filed a suit in the King County Superior Court against Dr. Mark Mulholland, along with Providence St. Joseph Health and Kadlec Regional Medical Center. The suit claims that she suffered both physical and sexual abuse during a consultation with the Tri-Cities OBGYN in August 2022. This lawsuit not only raises serious allegations against Dr. Mulholland but also shines a light on the systemic issues surrounding patient complaints within the healthcare system.

Jane Doe 100, represented by the law firm of Tamara N. Holder, LLC, details a harrowing ordeal during her appointment where she alleges Mulholland conducted an invasive exam without gloves and made inappropriate remarks, including unwarranted compliments regarding her private parts. Furthermore, the plaintiff states that the doctor’s aggressive manner and disregard for her dignity caused her significant pain and distress. Such conduct raises red flags regarding the standards of medical practice and patient care in these facilities.

The allegations do not stop there. Jane Doe 100 asserts that complaints about Dr. Mulholland had been reported to the defendants for years, as early as 2003, yet little action was taken to investigate or address the issues raised by multiple patients. Alarmingly, a formal complaint regarding Mulholland’s alleged abusive behavior was filed by the Washington Department of Public Health in April 2025, representing three patients who came forward with similar experiences.

Tamara Holder, one of the attorneys for Jane Doe 100, shared a profound disappointment regarding Mulholland’s alleged behavior and the systemic failures of the institutions that enabled such actions. "As a Kamiakin High School graduate, just like Mulholland, I am devastated to learn that, not only did he allegedly abuse so many trusting female patients, but that one of the few medical centers in the area lured women to him, only for them to be violently abused, and then the women were ignored when they complained," Holder stated.

The lawsuit claims sex-based discrimination, institutional negligence, and the defendants’ failure to protect patients from known dangers. The attorney duo, Holder and Elizabeth Hanley, who is also representing Jane Doe 100 in this matter, have a history of taking on powerful entities responsible for systemic abuse within healthcare settings.

Hanley, another key figure in this legal battle, emphasized the importance of hitting back against negligence, stating, "Mulholland's actions represent a horrifying betrayal of trust—and the healthcare institutions that enabled his abuse must also be held accountable." Their firm is currently advocating for over 150 female patients alleging similar injustices, suggesting a broader pattern that flaunts the rights and safety of vulnerable individuals.

The implications of this case extend beyond the immediate allegations against Dr. Mulholland. The lawsuit draws attention to the institutional breakdown present in organizations that are supposed to protect patient safety. It raises the question of what protocols are in place within healthcare facilities to handle allegations of misconduct and ensure that patient complaints do not fall on deaf ears. The potential repercussions for Providence St. Joseph Health and Kadlec Medical Center could be profound, as institutions are expected to maintain ethical standards and prioritize patient welfare.

As the case progresses, it serves as a poignant reminder of the courage required for survivors to come forward, particularly when facing powerful institutions. Holder and Hanley have pledged to fight ardently for justice not only for their current clients but also for countless others who have been silenced or ignored. The upcoming trial date will likely become a focal point, as both sides prepare to lay bare the painful truths and seek accountability for failures that have persisted for years. This case stands not only as a plea for justice for Jane Doe 100 but as a rallying cry for survivors of abuse everywhere, a testament to the necessity of listening, believing, and acting on grievances raised within the healthcare system.