Insights from BOXIL's Year-End Adjustment Software Survey
In
Japan, smart camp Co., Ltd., the operator of the SaaS comparison site
BOXIL, conducted a survey among 888 representatives responsible for year-end adjustments, particularly focusing on year-end adjustment systems and labor management systems. The objective of this survey was to clarify the market share of year-end adjustment software, the key factors companies consider when selecting a software, and the effects observed from its implementation.
Key Findings of the Survey
The survey revealed that the most chosen software for year-end adjustments was
MoneyForward Cloud Year-End Adjustment, followed closely by
freee HR & Labor and
Office Station Year-End Adjustment.
Software Popularity Rankings:
1.
MoneyForward Cloud Year-End Adjustment - 15.4%
2.
freee HR & Labor - 9.5%
3.
Office Station Year-End Adjustment - 8.4%
4.
Jobkan Labor HR - 8.2%
5.
SmartHR Labor Management - 7.1%
Selection Criteria for Year-End Adjustment Software
When companies selected their year-end adjustment software, several key factors emerged as significant. The most critical factor was the cost of implementation and operation, which garnered 37.4% of the responses. Other important considerations included:
- - Usability: 32.2%
- - Ease of integration with payroll and HR systems: 32.0%
- - Security: 30.8%
- - Proven track record: 29.1%
Impact of Implementation on Business Efficiency
An overwhelming 69.8% of companies realized a
time reduction of over 30% in their operations post-implementation. Among them, 51.9% reported a reduction of approximately 30%, while 17.9% observed more than a 50% decrease. This efficiency gain was especially noticeable in larger companies, where the elimination of document distribution, collection, and data entry resulted in a significant operational improvement.
Benefits Reported by Implementing Companies
When discussing the advantages of using year-end adjustment software, respondents highlighted numerous benefits:
- - Paperless Environment: 46.5% of respondents indicated the ability to achieve a paperless environment.
- - Reduction in Errors: 45.9% appreciated the decrease in data entry and transcription errors.
- - Easier Document Management: 36.8% noted that document collection and verification became much simpler.
- - Adaptive to Legal Changes: 31.6% valued the software’s ability to automatically comply with legal amendments.
- - Less Inquiries: 29.6% experienced fewer inquiries related to document issues.
Conclusion
The survey underscores the growing reliance on digital solutions in managing year-end adjustments among companies in Japan. With many firms experiencing significant time savings and reductions in errors, the adoption of year-end adjustment software appears to be on the rise.
To explore detailed findings of this survey, visit the following link:
BOXIL Year-End Adjustment Software Survey. Additionally, those interested in further enhancing their understanding of year-end adjustment software can access related articles on BOXIL’s website, including recommendations for free-to-use software options and comprehensive explanations of year-end adjustments.
For more insights, visit BOXIL to explore various SaaS solutions tailored to meet specific business requirements.