Israeli Property Developer Calls for Boycott of Cyprus President in U.S. Visit

Boycott Call by Yaakov Aykout Afik Amid Family Crisis



In a decisive move, Israeli businessman Yaakov (Jack) Aykout Afik, recognized as the leading property developer in Cyprus, has made a fervent appeal for U.S. Jewish organizations to boycott a meeting with President Nikos Christodoulides during the latter's ongoing visit to the United States. This call to action is deeply rooted in a personal crisis that has escalated tensions between the Aykout family and the Cypriot government.

Afik's father, Mr. Shimon Aykout, aged 75 and suffering from cancer, has been held in a Cypriot prison for an astonishing nine months without trial. The charges against him stem from accusations that he illegally traded land previously owned by Greek Cypriot refugees, who fled during the Turkish invasion of Cyprus 50 years ago. Afik describes his father's detention as wrongful and unjust, claiming it is a politically motivated action.

In his recent communication, Afik has not only requested support from the U.S. Jewish community but has also threatened to pursue legal action against the Cypriot government for alleged human rights violations. He seeks millions in compensation for the damage caused by his father's incarceration, which he argues is a blatant infringement of both human rights and legal norms.

Afik has secured expert legal opinions, including insights from Cambridge Professor Eyal Benvenisti, to substantiate his claims against Cyprus. These allegations include violations of international treaties and the European Court of Human Rights stipulations. The legal battle represents not only a personal fight but also serves as a broader commentary on the rule of law in Cyprus and its treatment of individuals based on political affiliations.

The unexpected legal and political complexities surrounding this case have drawn significant media attention, especially as the relationship dynamics between Cyprus, Israel, and the global Jewish community become increasingly complex. Afik’s call for boycott signifies potential diplomatic repercussions, adding layers of tension to the existing situation.

As the story unfolds, this call to action illuminates not only the hardships endured by the Aykout family but also raises questions about the state of justice in Cyprus, particularly as it pertains to long-standing historical grievances involving property and rights.

In light of these developments, the U.S. Jewish groups are urged to reflect on their position regarding political meetings with representatives of nations implicated in human rights controversies. The outcome of this situation could either foster an alliance or create further divides, depending on how both parties choose to navigate this sensitive issue.

The Aykout case thus stands as a potent reminder of the fragile interplay between business, politics, and family in the arena of international relations, urging continued scrutiny and advocacy from the global community.

Topics Policy & Public Interest)

【About Using Articles】

You can freely use the title and article content by linking to the page where the article is posted.
※ Images cannot be used.

【About Links】

Links are free to use.