#USA #Los Angeles #Barry Brock #Cedars-Sinai #Medical Lawsuit

New Allegations Against Barry Brock and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

In a disturbing continuation of allegations against OBGYN Barry J. Brock, 107 additional women have come forward, adding to a mounting tapestry of reported abuses. This latest complaint, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, asserts that Brock engaged in severe sexual misconduct while these women were in his care. With this contribution, the total number of women alleging misconduct rises to over 150. The legal action has been initiated by the prominent law firms of Arias Sanguinetti and The DiPietro Law Firm.

Various claims in the lawsuit include accusations of sexual harassment, sexual assault, sexual battery, negligence, and invasion of privacy. Attorney Mike Arias commented, "Women continue to come forward to accuse Dr. Brock of the most offensive behavior imaginable from an OBGYN. Not only did he endanger the health and safety of these women, but also the well-being of their unborn and newborn babies."

The allegations not only implicate Brock but suggest a pattern of negligence on the part of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. According to attorney Anthony DiPietro, despite numerous prior complaints against Dr. Brock, the hospital failed to protect its patients adequately, increasing the trauma experienced by the women involved. He stated, "These women have endured horrific treatment at the hands of Barry J. Brock, and the cover-up and neglect by Cedars-Sinai only aggravated their suffering."

The documented claims go back several decades, detailing horrifying instances of inappropriate behavior. The plaintiffs, anonymously referred to as Jane Does, accuse Brock of:

• - Inappropriate Questions: Asking deeply personal and inappropriate questions during examinations.
• - Grooming Tactics: Utilizing manipulative strategies to break down patient resistance.
• - Medical Misconduct: Conducting unnecessary breast and vaginal examinations disguised as legitimate medical procedures.
• - Excessive Genital Examinations: Performing unwarranted genital checks at nearly every visit, allegedly for his sexual pleasure.
• - Abusive Examinations: Engaging in sexually exploitative examinations that were far from standard medical practices.
• - Barbaric Stitching Practices: Executing harmful stitching procedures known as the "daddy stitch" or "husband's stitch", intended to meet his obscene desires, rather than patient care.
• - Dangerous Vaginal Births: Performing hazardous deliveries that violated patient safety protocols.

The case underlines a broader issue of accountability within healthcare institutions concerning patient safety and consent. Despite multiple internal complaints and warnings about Brock’s actions, the hospital's inaction raises questions about systemic failures to protect patients.

The lawsuit, known as Jane Doe #17 et al. v. Barry J. Brock, MD, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, reflects deeper issues of trust and patient advocacy within the medical community. The recent developments suggest that many may have suffered in silence, and these women, in sharing their stories, hope to hold Brock and the health care providers who failed them accountable.

Arias Sanguinetti, with offices spread across Los Angeles, the Bay Area, and Las Vegas, has built a reputation for advocating for those harmed through negligence and abuse. Their commitment includes securing over $1.5 billion in personal injury and abuse-related claims for their clients.

Handling these sensitive cases with extreme care, The DiPietro Law Firm provides a support network for survivors of sexual exploitation and abuse, ensuring they're not only heard but also assisted in the journey toward recovery.

The unfolding aspects of this case may not only impact the lives of the involved women but also initiate a pivotal conversation about medical ethics and safety practices in healthcare. As such, the public will be watching closely as the legal proceedings progress, hopeful for justice and change within the system that failed so many.