Major Lawsuit Filed Over Traumatic Brain Injury in Midland Oilfield Incident
A Midland-based man has recently initiated a multi-million dollar lawsuit against Orteq Energy Technologies, LLC, the supplier of oilfield equipment, claiming that their cement pump truck posed unreasonable dangers, leading to a severe incident that caused him traumatic brain injury.
The lawsuit, filed in the 142nd District Court of Midland County, Texas, highlights serious concerns over workplace safety and equipment design standards in the oil and gas industry. According to court documents, the incident occurred earlier this year when the plaintiff, Scott Calcote, and his team were engaged at a well site in Midland County for cementing operations.
During a routine procedure, Calcote fell approximately ten feet from the cement pump truck, which he alleges was designed defectively. The suit asserts that the area where he was standing lacked adequate safety barriers, making it an unreasonably hazardous environment. As a result of the fall, Calcote suffered catastrophic injuries, including a severe skull fracture and a traumatic brain injury that necessitated immediate emergency medical attention and life-saving neurosurgery, ultimately resulting in permanent disability.
Derek Potts, managing partner at Potts Law Firm, which represents Calcote, emphasized the inherent dangers oilfield workers face daily and the critical need for stringent safety measures. He stated, "Oilfield workers operate in one of the most perilous working environments globally, facing numerous risks daily. The addition of unsafe equipment only exacerbates these dangers, which is simply unacceptable."
The accusations further allege that Orteq Energy Technologies failed to adhere to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations during the design and sale of the cement truck, classifying it as dangerous and defective by default.
The case of Scott Calcote v. Orteq Energy Technologies, LLC, bearing the case number DCV-24-00542, signifies a broader dilemma within the oil production sector concerning employee safety and accountability among equipment suppliers.
The lawsuit sheds light on the pressing need for industry stakeholders to prioritize the development of safer drills and equipment, and it could serve as a cautionary tale urging companies to enhance their operational practices and safety standards. As the legal proceedings unfold, many will be watching closely to see the ramifications this case may have on future oilfield operations and equipment regulations.
In the aftermath of severe accidents, it is paramount for affected workers and families to seek justice and compensation for their suffering and losses. The legal actions taken by individuals like Calcote not only seek reparation but also aim to drive systemic changes within industries known for their inherent risks. When high stakes are involved, the dialogue surrounding occupational safety and rights becomes even more crucial, ensuring that no more lives are altered due to negligence in protecting workers’ rights and safety.
The lawsuit, filed in the 142nd District Court of Midland County, Texas, highlights serious concerns over workplace safety and equipment design standards in the oil and gas industry. According to court documents, the incident occurred earlier this year when the plaintiff, Scott Calcote, and his team were engaged at a well site in Midland County for cementing operations.
During a routine procedure, Calcote fell approximately ten feet from the cement pump truck, which he alleges was designed defectively. The suit asserts that the area where he was standing lacked adequate safety barriers, making it an unreasonably hazardous environment. As a result of the fall, Calcote suffered catastrophic injuries, including a severe skull fracture and a traumatic brain injury that necessitated immediate emergency medical attention and life-saving neurosurgery, ultimately resulting in permanent disability.
Derek Potts, managing partner at Potts Law Firm, which represents Calcote, emphasized the inherent dangers oilfield workers face daily and the critical need for stringent safety measures. He stated, "Oilfield workers operate in one of the most perilous working environments globally, facing numerous risks daily. The addition of unsafe equipment only exacerbates these dangers, which is simply unacceptable."
The accusations further allege that Orteq Energy Technologies failed to adhere to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations during the design and sale of the cement truck, classifying it as dangerous and defective by default.
The case of Scott Calcote v. Orteq Energy Technologies, LLC, bearing the case number DCV-24-00542, signifies a broader dilemma within the oil production sector concerning employee safety and accountability among equipment suppliers.
The lawsuit sheds light on the pressing need for industry stakeholders to prioritize the development of safer drills and equipment, and it could serve as a cautionary tale urging companies to enhance their operational practices and safety standards. As the legal proceedings unfold, many will be watching closely to see the ramifications this case may have on future oilfield operations and equipment regulations.
In the aftermath of severe accidents, it is paramount for affected workers and families to seek justice and compensation for their suffering and losses. The legal actions taken by individuals like Calcote not only seek reparation but also aim to drive systemic changes within industries known for their inherent risks. When high stakes are involved, the dialogue surrounding occupational safety and rights becomes even more crucial, ensuring that no more lives are altered due to negligence in protecting workers’ rights and safety.
Topics Policy & Public Interest）
【About Using Articles】
You can freely use the title and article content by linking to the page where the article is posted.
※ Images cannot be used.
【About Links】
Links are free to use.