Advocates Urge CMS to Reconsider Genetic Testing Coverage for Seniors
In a significant move highlighting the needs of America's cancer patients, a coalition known as Secure Our Care, part of the 60 Plus Association, joined forces with various advocacy groups like the American Consumer Institute and the Association of Mature American Citizens. Their objective? To persuade the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to rescind a contentious Local Coverage Determination (LCD) regarding genetic testing in oncology.
The letter sent to CMS's Acting Administrator, Stephanie Carlton, emphasizes the necessity for a fair review process when it comes to determining healthcare coverage, particularly for senior citizens under Medicare. The coalition argues that the current procedure has been undermined by bureaucratic mismanagement, leading to reduced coverage for critical tests. Without these tests, many patients are confronted with limited options for management and treatment of their conditions, which can lead to invasive and more expensive procedures.
According to the advocates, the implications of denying coverage extend beyond inconvenience. They pose a significant threat to medical innovation and optimal patient care in the U.S. The letter highlights how prior denials have severely restricted patients’ access to advances in diagnostic techniques, effectively stifling innovation within the healthcare sector and often forcing patients into a one-size-fits-all treatment model that does not account for individual patient needs.
"If our nation wishes to be a leader in medical innovation, we must ensure those who most need it access the latest advances in care," the letter asserts. The coalition points out that early intervention and personalized medicine can drastically improve outcomes and survival rates. For tons of elderly patients battling cancer, genetic testing for tailored treatment plans can make a world of difference.
The current LCD is slated to take effect in April, prompting urgency among advocates to influence its repeal. They call for a fresh examination of the scientific data surrounding genetic testing and a commitment from CMS to uphold patient-centered healthcare that genuinely enhances life quality.
This concerted effort from advocates reflects their growing concern over the procedural conduct of Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs). They have accused these organizations of operating outside legal frameworks and ignoring evidence that supports the necessity of genetic testing. In doing so, they have unintentionally created a system where patients either suffer from inadequate treatment options or are pushed toward more burdensome, costly alternatives.
In summarizing their stance, the coalition states, "A failure to allow for access to genetic testing for cancer not only limits innovation but places an undue burden on senior patients. This affects their quality of life and often leads to dire consequences that could have been avoided with proper care."
Secure Our Care stands as a beacon for advocacy, pushing to fortify healthcare access for seniors through transparent and equitable systems. Their mission emphasizes the need for a healthcare landscape where seniors don’t just receive care but also have a say in their treatment options, ensuring that their voices are heard. For more information, you can visit SecureOurCare.org.
The letter sent to CMS's Acting Administrator, Stephanie Carlton, emphasizes the necessity for a fair review process when it comes to determining healthcare coverage, particularly for senior citizens under Medicare. The coalition argues that the current procedure has been undermined by bureaucratic mismanagement, leading to reduced coverage for critical tests. Without these tests, many patients are confronted with limited options for management and treatment of their conditions, which can lead to invasive and more expensive procedures.
According to the advocates, the implications of denying coverage extend beyond inconvenience. They pose a significant threat to medical innovation and optimal patient care in the U.S. The letter highlights how prior denials have severely restricted patients’ access to advances in diagnostic techniques, effectively stifling innovation within the healthcare sector and often forcing patients into a one-size-fits-all treatment model that does not account for individual patient needs.
"If our nation wishes to be a leader in medical innovation, we must ensure those who most need it access the latest advances in care," the letter asserts. The coalition points out that early intervention and personalized medicine can drastically improve outcomes and survival rates. For tons of elderly patients battling cancer, genetic testing for tailored treatment plans can make a world of difference.
The current LCD is slated to take effect in April, prompting urgency among advocates to influence its repeal. They call for a fresh examination of the scientific data surrounding genetic testing and a commitment from CMS to uphold patient-centered healthcare that genuinely enhances life quality.
This concerted effort from advocates reflects their growing concern over the procedural conduct of Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs). They have accused these organizations of operating outside legal frameworks and ignoring evidence that supports the necessity of genetic testing. In doing so, they have unintentionally created a system where patients either suffer from inadequate treatment options or are pushed toward more burdensome, costly alternatives.
In summarizing their stance, the coalition states, "A failure to allow for access to genetic testing for cancer not only limits innovation but places an undue burden on senior patients. This affects their quality of life and often leads to dire consequences that could have been avoided with proper care."
Secure Our Care stands as a beacon for advocacy, pushing to fortify healthcare access for seniors through transparent and equitable systems. Their mission emphasizes the need for a healthcare landscape where seniors don’t just receive care but also have a say in their treatment options, ensuring that their voices are heard. For more information, you can visit SecureOurCare.org.
Topics Health）
【About Using Articles】
You can freely use the title and article content by linking to the page where the article is posted.
※ Images cannot be used.
【About Links】
Links are free to use.