Samsung Hit With $445.5 Million Verdict for Patent Infringement by Texas Jury

Samsung's Patent Infringement Case: A Major Verdict in Texas

On October 10, 2025, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas delivered a significant verdict, ordering Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. to pay $445,494,160 to Collision Communications Inc. This ruling stems from a patent infringement lawsuit, wherein the jury ruled in favor of Collision Communications, which alleged that Samsung had willfully infringed upon several of its patents crucial for mobile device communications.

The patents in question pertain to methods designed to minimize signal interference in network communications, technology originally developed by BAE Systems, a defense contractor. Collision Communications obtained these patents nearly 15 years ago with the aim of commercializing the technology for use in cellular networks. This case underscores the intense competition and critical nature of patent protections in the rapidly evolving telecommunications sector.

The trial featured a jury composed of eight members—seven women and one man—who unanimously reached their decision after evaluating evidence presented during the trial. This included insights into past discussions between Collision Communications and Samsung, which occurred from 2011 to 2014, regarding a potential business collaboration. During these discussions, the parties assessed various facets of Collision's patent portfolio.

Leading the legal team for Collision Communications was seasoned attorney Brad Caldwell from the Dallas-based firm Caldwell Cassady & Curry, known for its experience in high-stakes civil litigation, particularly in patent cases. Other key members of Caldwell's trial team included Chris Stewart, Justin Nemunaitis, and Aisha Mahmood Haley, along with Andrea Fair from Miller Fair Henry in Longview, Texas, who also represented Collision at trial.

The jury's verdict reflects the substantial financial implications faced by Samsung due to its infringement of these crucial patents. This is not just a setback for the tech giant; it raises questions regarding the competitive practices in the mobile telecommunications industry, where patent portfolios can significantly dictate market power.

Caldwell Cassady & Curry, the law firm representing Collision Communications, has a robust history, having achieved some of the most prominent verdicts against major corporations in the United States. Their expertise in intellectual property law makes them a formidable player in navigating complex patent litigation.

The case emphasizes the importance of intellectual property rights in technology and telecommunication sectors, encouraging other companies to reconsider their patent compliance strategies. Going forward, this ruling may serve as a precedent, influencing how telecom companies approach partnerships and negotiations involving shared technology and patent portfolios.

In a world where tech innovation is paramount, the verdict also highlights the ongoing challenges companies face in balancing the development and protection of intellectual property while navigating competitive business landscapes. Furthermore, as technology continues to develop, the legal frameworks surrounding patents may be tested further, leading to potentially new standards in the industry.