Zirkin & Schmerling Lawyers Achieve Major $310,000 Settlement for Dog Bite Victim
In a significant development, Zirkin & Schmerling Injury Lawyers have successfully negotiated a $310,000 settlement for a young child who faced severe injuries from a dog bite incident. This case highlights the challenges that injury victims often encounter when dealing with insurance companies that may not act in good faith.
The incident, which involved a young minor, resulted in both physical and psychological trauma. After the unfortunate dog bite, the insurance provider's response was far from adequate; their initial settlement offer was disappointingly low and did not appropriately address the extent of the child's injuries or the potential long-term impacts. Recognizing the inadequacy of the offer, the legal team at Zirkin & Schmerling quickly recognized that a more aggressive approach was necessary to ensure the child received fair compensation.
In light of the insurer's unwillingness to engage in sincere negotiations, the attorneys from Zirkin & Schmerling submitted a detailed bad-faith demand letter to the insurance company. This letter served multiple purposes: it outlined the obligations of the insurer under the insurance policy, described the severity of the child's injuries, and indicated the possible legal repercussions for not adequately evaluating the claim.
The move to initiate a bad-faith claim ultimately resulted in a strategic shift in the negotiations. According to Bobby Zirkin, founding partner of the firm, “Insurance companies have a duty to treat injury victims fairly—especially when a child's future is at stake. When we saw that this insurer was not acting in good faith, we took immediate action. Our bad-faith advocacy made it clear that we were prepared to hold them accountable. That pressure ultimately led to a resolution that truly protects this child's future.”
Following the issuance of the bad-faith letter, the pressure mounted on the insurance provider, leading to intensified discussions. It became clear that if they continued to resist a fair settlement, they would face the risk of legal action. Ultimately, the insurer agreed to the $310,000 settlement, providing much-needed financial security for the child's forthcoming medical expenses and recovery needs.
Zirkin & Schmerling Injury Lawyers have a solid reputation in Maryland, representing individuals harmed through no fault of their own. Their attorneys are known for their tenacity in the courtroom and skilled negotiation tactics, focused on delivering favorable results for their clients. The firm operates under a strict "No Recovery, No Fee" policy, which alleviates financial pressures on clients pursuing justice for their injuries.
Established with a mission to help those affected by personal injury, the firm is also recognized for their profound community engagement and contributions to legal education. The resolution of this dog bite case not only reflects their commitment to client advocacy but also serves as a noteworthy example of the positive outcomes that arise from pursuing justice against negligent parties.
To find more details about Zirkin & Schmerling and their legal services, visit their official website at www.zirkinandschmerlinglaw.com.
The incident, which involved a young minor, resulted in both physical and psychological trauma. After the unfortunate dog bite, the insurance provider's response was far from adequate; their initial settlement offer was disappointingly low and did not appropriately address the extent of the child's injuries or the potential long-term impacts. Recognizing the inadequacy of the offer, the legal team at Zirkin & Schmerling quickly recognized that a more aggressive approach was necessary to ensure the child received fair compensation.
In light of the insurer's unwillingness to engage in sincere negotiations, the attorneys from Zirkin & Schmerling submitted a detailed bad-faith demand letter to the insurance company. This letter served multiple purposes: it outlined the obligations of the insurer under the insurance policy, described the severity of the child's injuries, and indicated the possible legal repercussions for not adequately evaluating the claim.
The move to initiate a bad-faith claim ultimately resulted in a strategic shift in the negotiations. According to Bobby Zirkin, founding partner of the firm, “Insurance companies have a duty to treat injury victims fairly—especially when a child's future is at stake. When we saw that this insurer was not acting in good faith, we took immediate action. Our bad-faith advocacy made it clear that we were prepared to hold them accountable. That pressure ultimately led to a resolution that truly protects this child's future.”
Following the issuance of the bad-faith letter, the pressure mounted on the insurance provider, leading to intensified discussions. It became clear that if they continued to resist a fair settlement, they would face the risk of legal action. Ultimately, the insurer agreed to the $310,000 settlement, providing much-needed financial security for the child's forthcoming medical expenses and recovery needs.
Zirkin & Schmerling Injury Lawyers have a solid reputation in Maryland, representing individuals harmed through no fault of their own. Their attorneys are known for their tenacity in the courtroom and skilled negotiation tactics, focused on delivering favorable results for their clients. The firm operates under a strict "No Recovery, No Fee" policy, which alleviates financial pressures on clients pursuing justice for their injuries.
Established with a mission to help those affected by personal injury, the firm is also recognized for their profound community engagement and contributions to legal education. The resolution of this dog bite case not only reflects their commitment to client advocacy but also serves as a noteworthy example of the positive outcomes that arise from pursuing justice against negligent parties.
To find more details about Zirkin & Schmerling and their legal services, visit their official website at www.zirkinandschmerlinglaw.com.
Topics Other）
【About Using Articles】
You can freely use the title and article content by linking to the page where the article is posted.
※ Images cannot be used.
【About Links】
Links are free to use.