#Cybersecurity #Denmark #Copenhagen #Remote Access #Secomea

Overconfidence in Remote Access Security Within Industrial Sector

As we step into 2026, many industrial organizations seem to be buoyed by an increasing sense of confidence regarding their remote access security measures. However, a recent report commissioned by Secomea paints a concerning picture of the disconnect between perceived security and actual operational realities.

Key Findings from the Report

Confidence vs. Reality

The report titled "The State of Industrial Remote Access 2026" is based on a comprehensive survey involving 400 senior executives from manufacturing and critical infrastructure sectors. Findings suggest a rising confidence among these executives, with many reportedly viewing their session visibility and regulatory readiness as satisfactory. Yet, deeper examinations reveal significant gaps in essential areas such as vendor oversight, credential hygiene, and overall auditability.

Vendor Access as a Risk Multiplier

A staggering revelation in the report highlights vendor access as a major risk multiplier. Organizations managing between 21 to 100 external vendors exhibit the highest levels of exposure to potential incidents. It's worth noting that this vendor-related risk is less about the behavior of vendors themselves, but more about how organizations manage and govern their vendor access. Inadequate oversight tends to create a breeding ground for vulnerabilities.

Partial Visibility Affects Security

Only 43% of respondents reported having full audit trails for vendor sessions, suggesting a predominant reliance on partial visibility. This lack of comprehensive vendor oversight often leads to significant compliance issues and blind spots in forensic investigations following security incidents. Unfortunately, the report establishes a clear correlation between limited vendor visibility and heightened incident exposure.

Impact of Zero Trust Adoption

Interestingly, companies adopting Zero Trust architecture exhibited measurable benefits. The report found a noteworthy connectivity between adopting Zero Trust principles and achieving higher levels of session visibility, improved vendor audit trails, and faster enablement speeds with reduced incident volatility. Organizations implementing all five core Zero Trust principles achieved security visibility levels that traditional tools couldn't deliver alone.

IT/OT Governance Models Reveal Trends

A structural shift is occurring as nearly 70% of organizations adopt shared IT and Operational Technology (OT) governance models. The study concluded that this governance strategy is consistently linked with positive outcomes related to security, operational efficiency, and auditability. Conversely, areas where governance alignment diminishes see an almost threefold increase in vendor-related incident exposure.

Tool Fragmentation Complicates Management

The increasing complexity stemming from using multiple remote access tools—such as VPNs, OEM utilities, and Privileged Access Management solutions—illustrated a notable decline in session visibility. Organizations relying on three or more disconnected remote access tools reported increased friction and diminished visibility compared to their counterparts configured with consolidated solutions.

Consolidation of Remote Access Tools

There is a noteworthy shift currently underway towards identity-centric, unified OT remote access platforms. Compared to organizations not utilizing OT-dedicated platforms, users reported improved session visibility, more robust audit trails, and enhanced IT/OT alignment, which collectively led to a reduction in incident exposure.

Stratification of Access: A Necessary Evolution

As regulatory pressures rise alongside an expanding vendor ecosystem, the industrial sector is converging toward new frameworks for remote access management. Future strategies emphasize:

• - Federated vendor control models
• - Shared IT/OT governance
• - Identity-based access enforcement
• - Time-bound, session-based permissions
• - Unified auditability

The study portrays a critical transition from fragmented systems to a more standardized and secure, policy-driven approach to remote operations.

Conclusion: Preparing for a Secure Future

The findings in "The State of Industrial Remote Access 2026" offer crucial insights into the landscape of industrial cybersecurity, urging organizations to reassess their security postures amidst rising confidence. By aligning governance models, adopting Zero Trust principles, and consolidating access tools, industrial organizations can better safeguard their operations against the challenges posed by remote access vulnerabilities. As the industry moves forward, those who adapt strategically to these transitions are likely to emerge more resilient and secure.

Secomea, the organization behind this vital report, continues to lead in providing Secure Remote Access solutions tailored specifically to meet the complexities of industrial needs, aiding industries in managing secure access and reinforcing cybersecurity across global operations.