Virginia Residents Strongly Oppose Online Casino Gambling
Recent polling data from Virginia reveals widespread disapproval of online casino gambling, commonly referred to as iGaming. A significant 76% of respondents voiced their objections after being informed of the associated risks and potential harms. The survey, conducted by Lake Research Partners on behalf of the National Association Against iGaming (NAAiG), highlights a strong resistance that cuts across various demographics and political affiliations.
Key Findings of the Poll
The survey, which reached out to 600 voters in Virginia from February 19-22, 2026, featured compelling findings:
- - 76% Opposition: An overwhelming majority of voters expressed opposition to the legalization of iGaming, with 65% indicating they are strongly against it after learning about the mental health and economic repercussions observed in other states.
- - Awareness Gap: Notably, 41% of voters revealed they were unaware of iGaming altogether until it was defined for them in the survey, demonstrating a significant gap in public knowledge.
- - Voting Decisions Influenced: A striking 62% indicated they would reconsider their support for any candidates in the Virginia General Assembly who advocate for the legalization of iGaming.
This strong sentiment was echoed by Oliver Barie, a spokesman for NAAiG, who noted, “This survey shows Virginians across the political spectrum oppose online gambling.” He emphasized the issue of high-risk gambling being accessible every day on personal devices, which could potentially heighten addiction and financial distress among citizens.
Demographic Breakdown
The opposition spans various demographics:
- - By Gender: 81% of women are opposed compared to 69% of men.
- - By Race: 78% of White voters and 68% of Black voters expressed similar disapproval.
- - By Political Affiliation: 75% of Democrats, 76% of Independents, and 77% of Republicans all showed resistance against the proposal.
Concerns Over Addiction and Community Impact
The rise of online gambling raises alarms about increased addiction rates, particularly among vulnerable populations. Barie points out that claims regarding the potential benefits of legalization, such as protecting minors and enhancing responsible gaming standards, are misleading. The reality remains that iGaming has been consistently rejected in numerous states, a trend that underscores the risks associated with it.
Legislative Implications
With voters indicating that their support is contingent on candidates' stances regarding online gambling, the implications for future legislation are profound. As Barie puts it, “Ignoring their concerns would be a mistake.” The voices of the electorate are expected to resonate in upcoming elections, compelling lawmakers to pay close attention to public sentiment.
About NAAiG
The National Association Against iGaming is committed to protecting communities from the adverse effects of online gambling. Comprised of local businesses, community advocates, and concerned citizens, NAAiG focuses on preserving local jobs, ensuring economic stability, and promoting responsible gaming practices. Unlike online gambling, which lacks sufficient safeguards against underage plays and problem gambling, in-person gaming continues to be a reliable, regulated avenue that supports local economies by generating stable employment and reinvesting in public services.
Conclusion
As the opposition against the legalization of online casino gambling continues to grow, Virginians are making their voices heard. The results from the recent survey serve as a stark reminder of the complexities surrounding the issue, pushing for informed conversations about the impacts of gambling legislation on local communities. The future of iGaming in Virginia hangs in the balance, clearly dependent on the will of its citizens.