Exploring U.S. Immigration Policy: A Call for Balanced Reform

Understanding U.S. Immigration Policy Failures

A new publication from Negative Population Growth, Inc. (NPG), titled Common Sense Immigration Policy in an Era of Theatrics, authored by Nathanial Gronewold, Ph.D., sheds light on the pressing failures of U.S. immigration policies. The paper, released on October 16, 2025, evaluates the contrasting approaches adopted by both the Biden and Trump administrations, revealing that both strategies have been flawed and detrimental to the country's long-term interests.

The report begins with an analysis of recent immigration trends, including a record influx of migrants during the Biden administration followed by a stricter crackdown under Trump. Dr. Gronewold argues that neither of these methods effectively addresses the challenges posed by immigration; instead, they contribute to exasperating existing problems. For example, the strain placed on local resources in cities, alongside the negative repercussions for the tourism and economy resulting from harsh enforcement measures, highlights the urgent need for a rethink of current practices.

At the heart of Dr. Gronewold's arguments is a call for balanced and rational immigration policies. He emphasizes the necessity of an immigration system that is not only compliant with the law but also maintains sensible pathways for legal immigration. The paper connects immigration issues with the broader theme of U.S. population size and its environmental and societal ramifications.

Dr. Gronewold explicitly states, "Immigration under Biden was haphazard, expensive, and harmful. Immigration under Trump is similarly haphazard and causing the U.S. unnecessary harm, only in different ways," which encapsulates the central concern of the paper. He urges for a centered approach: one that allows controlled entry into the United States while promoting reasonable legal immigration pathways, as well as recognizing the inevitability of population decline.

The importance of this publication extends beyond academic discourse; it serves as a critical resource for policymakers, researchers, and the general public. It tackles the urgency of moving past political theatrics towards developing a sustainable and pragmatic immigration framework. Craig Lewis, the Executive Director of NPG, asserted, "Sustainable immigration policy is essential to securing the future well-being of our nation. By prioritizing stability and long-term planning, we can better tackle the challenges of population change and cultivate a more secure, prosperous environment for future generations."

NPG has been advocating for a reduction in population growth since its inception in 1972, striving to maintain an equilibrium with our environmental resources. The organization promotes its Proposed National Population Policy, which aims to stabilize the U.S. population at a sustainable level, significantly lower than the current figures. This initiative not only identifies the existing problems but also puts forth actionable solutions.

In conclusion, as U.S. policymakers engage in discussions regarding immigration reforms, Dr. Gronewold's insights serve as a timely reminder of the complexities involved. The need for a balanced, common-sense approach to immigration is paramount. As we move into the future, a sound immigration policy will be critical not just for managing numbers but for securing a harmonious existence within the ever-evolving fabric of American society.

For more information on this publication and NPG's initiatives, visit their website at NPG.org. Additionally, stay connected with them on social media: follow on Facebook @NegativePopulationGrowth or on X @npg_org.