Oved & Oved LLP Achieves Landmark Trademark Victory for The Lawfare Project
In a monumental verdict, Oved & Oved LLP has successfully represented The Lawfare Project (TLP) in a significant trademark case that could reshape the landscape for collective trademark ownership. The decision, made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, represents a first in the nearly 80-year history of the Lanham Act—the law governing trademarks in the United States. This ruling acknowledges for the first time that organizations can co-own a trademark when it is co-developed through collaborative efforts.
The legal battle stemmed from a contentious disagreement with Zioness Movement Inc. (ZMI) over the trademark for 'Zioness.' The Southern District of New York initially ruled in favor of TLP, rejecting ZMI's claim asserting sole control of the mark. The jury's unanimous decision recognized TLP not only as a co-founder but also as a co-owner, securing its rightful role in the creation and ongoing management of the Zioness trademark.
Brooke Goldstein, the founder and executive director of TLP, expressed her enthusiasm about the appellate court's decision, emphasizing the importance of TLP’s involvement in establishing the Zioness initiative. "We are delighted that the Court of Appeals has validated our essential role in crafting Zioness as well as highlighting the unsubstantiated nature of ZMI's claims. This outcome ensures that we can exercise our rights and benefits related to the co-ownership and co-registration of the Zioness trademark— a victory earned through the incredible work of our attorneys at Oved & Oved!"
The implications of this ruling extend beyond the parties involved; it carries significant consequences for trademark law, particularly for nonprofits and other mission-driven enterprises. Historically, organizations engaged in collaborative efforts have faced uncertainties concerning the ownership of intellectual property they create together. The Court’s decision clarifies these issues, offering guidance and assurance that collaborative entities can retain their intellectual property rights while engaging in cooperative initiatives.
The legal team from Oved & Oved, comprised of Darren Oved, Terrence Oved, Aaron J. Solomon, and Timothy Savitsky, lauded the decision not only for affirming key principles of trademark law but also for reinforcing TLP’s crucial role in the advancement of the Zioness movement. "This ruling sends a clear message: organizations participating in shared creative projects are empowered to safeguard their messaging and the intellectual property arising from their joint efforts," they remarked.
The affirmation of TLP’s rights cements their commitment to championing civil rights and safeguarding the integrity of their initiative-driven projects. Likewise, this case enhances Oved & Oved's standing as a powerful player in the realm of complex intellectual property litigation.
As the landscape of trademark law continues to evolve, this landmark ruling opens new doors for organizations looking to collaborate on shared goals while securing their intellectual rights. No longer will collaborative efforts be shrouded in ambiguity concerning ownership claims.
With this ruling, TLP stands fortified in its mission with the assurance that its hard-fought achievements will be protected and recognized in the complex world of intellectual property. The case illustrates the importance of effective legal advocacy in ensuring that transformative social movements are both supported and properly represented within the legal framework governing trademark rights.
The legal battle stemmed from a contentious disagreement with Zioness Movement Inc. (ZMI) over the trademark for 'Zioness.' The Southern District of New York initially ruled in favor of TLP, rejecting ZMI's claim asserting sole control of the mark. The jury's unanimous decision recognized TLP not only as a co-founder but also as a co-owner, securing its rightful role in the creation and ongoing management of the Zioness trademark.
Brooke Goldstein, the founder and executive director of TLP, expressed her enthusiasm about the appellate court's decision, emphasizing the importance of TLP’s involvement in establishing the Zioness initiative. "We are delighted that the Court of Appeals has validated our essential role in crafting Zioness as well as highlighting the unsubstantiated nature of ZMI's claims. This outcome ensures that we can exercise our rights and benefits related to the co-ownership and co-registration of the Zioness trademark— a victory earned through the incredible work of our attorneys at Oved & Oved!"
The implications of this ruling extend beyond the parties involved; it carries significant consequences for trademark law, particularly for nonprofits and other mission-driven enterprises. Historically, organizations engaged in collaborative efforts have faced uncertainties concerning the ownership of intellectual property they create together. The Court’s decision clarifies these issues, offering guidance and assurance that collaborative entities can retain their intellectual property rights while engaging in cooperative initiatives.
The legal team from Oved & Oved, comprised of Darren Oved, Terrence Oved, Aaron J. Solomon, and Timothy Savitsky, lauded the decision not only for affirming key principles of trademark law but also for reinforcing TLP’s crucial role in the advancement of the Zioness movement. "This ruling sends a clear message: organizations participating in shared creative projects are empowered to safeguard their messaging and the intellectual property arising from their joint efforts," they remarked.
The affirmation of TLP’s rights cements their commitment to championing civil rights and safeguarding the integrity of their initiative-driven projects. Likewise, this case enhances Oved & Oved's standing as a powerful player in the realm of complex intellectual property litigation.
As the landscape of trademark law continues to evolve, this landmark ruling opens new doors for organizations looking to collaborate on shared goals while securing their intellectual rights. No longer will collaborative efforts be shrouded in ambiguity concerning ownership claims.
With this ruling, TLP stands fortified in its mission with the assurance that its hard-fought achievements will be protected and recognized in the complex world of intellectual property. The case illustrates the importance of effective legal advocacy in ensuring that transformative social movements are both supported and properly represented within the legal framework governing trademark rights.
Topics Other）
【About Using Articles】
You can freely use the title and article content by linking to the page where the article is posted.
※ Images cannot be used.
【About Links】
Links are free to use.