Family Celebrates $50 Million Verdict Following Tragic Medical Oversight

$50 Million Verdict in Medical Malpractice Case

A remarkable verdict was reached recently in a case that underscores the critical importance of patient care standards. After a 13-day trial, the prominent law firm Cunningham Bounds obtained a staggering $50 million judgment for the grieving family of Dan Haas, who tragically passed away following a hospital visit that should have saved his life.

Dan's journey began on December 24, 2020, after returning from a hunting trip where he experienced excruciating pain and shortness of breath. Despite these alarming symptoms, he was merely advised to follow up with a stress test, which would not take place until the following Monday. This delay would prove critical.

Upon his visit to Cardiology Associates on December 28, an abnormal cardiac stress test revealed a dangerous blockage requiring immediate attention. However, instead of prompt intervention, Dr. John Galla, his cardiologist, sent him home. He was cleared for a non-emergency eye surgery scheduled for the following week and instructed to begin blood thinners after the surgery. This shocking decision, despite clear evidence indicating imminent danger, led to Dan's untimely death that very night.

What followed was a compelling legal battle, during which expert medical testimonies emphasized that had Dr. Galla admitted Dan for treatment, he had a 99% survival chance. Testimonies from leading cardiology experts showcased the inadequacies in care that Dan received and illustrated the stark contrast between the medical records and the defense's claims.

Cunningham Bounds' trial team, comprised of Skip Finkbohner, Lucy Tufts, Dave Wirtes, and Carmen Chambers, articulated the negligence and failure to adhere to recognized medical standards. Tufts poignantly stated, “The Haas family has fought tirelessly to unearth the truth, and this verdict serves as validation for their grief and struggles over the past five years. Dan should have been treated immediately in the hospital, which would have saved his life.”

The defense, representing the cardiology practice, attempted to undermine the validity of their own records, arguing inconsistencies that simply did not hold up under scrutiny. The jury’s decision reflects a resounding condemnation of the disregard for patient safety which ultimately cost Dan his life.

Finkbohner further added, “We sought a fair resolution before trial, but the defense showed no willingness to engage, forcing us to present this case to a jury.” This verdict sends a clear message to healthcare professionals about the non-negotiable standards of care owed to patients.

Cunningham Bounds has proudly represented plaintiffs for over 65 years, championing victims in personal injury, medical malpractice, and complex litigation cases. Their commitment to candidly fighting for justice continues, ensuring patients and their families receive the accountability they deserve in medical settings.

For further information about Cunningham Bounds and their impactful work, visit www.cunninghambounds.com.