Fluor Corporation Investors Invited to Join Class Action Lawsuit Following Major Losses

Investor Alert: Fluor Corporation Class Action Lawsuit

In a significant development for investors of Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR), Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP has announced the initiation of a class action lawsuit against the company. The lawsuit serves as a call to action for those who suffered substantial financial losses while trading Fluor securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025. Investors have until November 14, 2025, to seek the position of lead plaintiff in this case, officially titled Maglione v. Fluor Corporation. This litigation is taking place in the Northern District of Texas under case number 25-cv-02496.

Fluor, known for its extensive services in engineering, procurement, and construction, has made headlines recently due to allegations regarding its financial practices and the management of major infrastructure projects. The class action lawsuit accuses Fluor and some of its top current and former executives of violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, primarily due to misleading statements that resulted in significant investor losses.

Case Allegations

According to the complaint, several major infrastructure projects like the Gordie Howe International Bridge and highways I-635/LBJ and I-35 in Texas suffered from escalating costs due to subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays. The plaintiffs argue that these issues were not disclosed adequately to investors, leading to a false sense of security about Fluor's financial health.

Furthermore, the suit contends that Fluor’s financial forecasts for fiscal year 2025 were not just overly optimistic but fundamentally flawed. The complaint asserts that the company downplayed the effects of economic uncertainty and upcoming project delays, misrepresenting its actual financial state to investors.

On August 1, 2025, when Fluor released its second-quarter results, it reported earnings per share of $0.43, which was significantly below analysts' expectations by $0.13 and reflected a staggering year-over-year revenue decline of 5.9%. These disappointing figures were largely attributed to rising costs in multiple projects. During the earnings call, Fluor's CEO, James R. Breuer, linked these financial setbacks directly to the inefficiencies and errors in their major infrastructure projects.

This revelation led to a steep decline in Fluor's stock price, plummeting over 27% in the wake of the earnings announcement. As per the class action, the plaintiffs aim to hold Fluor accountable for the misinformation that led to these losses.

The Lead Plaintiff Process

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who acquired Fluor securities during the specified class period to apply to be the lead plaintiff. This individual is typically one who has the largest financial interest and is representative of the group's claims. The lead plaintiff not only directs the lawsuit but is also free to choose their preferred law firm to represent them and the rest of the class.

About Robbins Geller

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is regarded as one of the foremost law firms specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. It has successfully secured numerous high-profile victories for investors over the years, including record-breaking sums in securities-related class action cases. In 2024 alone, the firm recovered over $2.5 billion for its clients, underscoring its commitment to investor rights.

For affected Fluor investors looking to engage in this lawsuit or seek further information, contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal at Robbins Geller via phone at 800-449-4900, or visit their website.

As this case progresses, it emphasizes the essential nature of transparency and honesty in corporate communications and the potential repercussions if companies fall short of their obligations to investors.