#United States #Robbins Geller #San Diego #Class Action #Dow Inc.

Class Action Opportunity for Dow Inc. Investors

On September 27, 2025, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP made a significant announcement concerning investors in Dow Inc. (NYSE: DOW). The law firm revealed that those who acquired Dow securities between January 30, 2025, and July 23, 2025, might have the opportunity to lead a class action lawsuit. The deadline for interested parties to step forward as lead plaintiffs is set for October 28, 2025. This lawsuit is titled Sarti v. Dow Inc., bearing the case number No. 25-cv-12744 in the Eastern District of Michigan.

Allegations Against Dow Inc.

The allegations against Dow Inc. and some of its top executives are serious. They are charged with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The lawsuit asserts that during the class period, Dow exhibited misleading practices regarding the company's ability to withstand economic pressures, particularly those related to tariffs and general market conditions. Additionally, the complaint claims that the actual extent of financial strain on Dow’s operations was masked, leading to shortfalls in investor expectations.

As detailed in the filing, on June 23, 2025, BMO Capital issued a downgrade on Dow’s stock from “Market Perform” to “Underperform” and adjusted the price target downwards from $29.00 to $22.00, asserting concerns over weakness in key markets. This news reportedly precipitated a decline in Dow's stock price by over 3%.

Subsequently, on July 24, Dow reported a staggering non-GAAP loss per share of $0.42 for the second quarter, a figure considerably higher than the forecasted loss by analysts, which ranged between $0.17 and $0.18. The company’s revenue also missed estimates significantly, reporting net sales of $10.1 billion — a 7.3% decline compared to the previous year. CEO Jim Fitterling attributed these dismal results to an ongoing adverse earnings environment and referenced oversupply issues from newer competitors.

In a move reflecting their financial difficulties, Dow announced a reduction in their dividend from $0.70 to $0.35 per share, aiming to preserve capital amidst ongoing challenges. The aftermath of this announcement saw a dramatic plunge in Dow's stock price, which dropped by over 17% on that day alone.

Importance of Serving as Lead Plaintiff

Investors who experienced considerable losses during the class period are now encouraged to serve as lead plaintiffs in this case. Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, any investor who acquired Dow securities within the specified timeframe can choose to act as lead plaintiff. This role is crucial as it represents the interests of all class members and is typically granted to the investor with the most financial stake in the outcome of the case. Serving as a lead plaintiff also allows individuals to handpick their legal representation, ensuring they have the support of a law firm of their choice.

Furthermore, participation in the lawsuit doesn’t limit an investor’s ability to recover potential damages as settlements are often negotiated on behalf of all class members, whether or not they serve as lead plaintiffs.

About Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP stands out as a leading law firm in the sphere of securities fraud and shareholder litigation. The firm has an impressive track record, having secured significant financial recoveries for investors over recent years. For instance, in 2024, they were instrumental in recovering more than $2.5 billion for clients in securities class action cases, outperforming all other law firms combined. Their extensive legal expertise is backed by a large team of attorneys across multiple offices, highlighting their stature as a major player in investor advocacy.

For more information, potential lead plaintiffs can visit their dedicated website or contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal at Robbins Geller.

Conclusion

The Dow Inc. class action lawsuit presents an opportunity for investors who have incurred losses to seek recourse against the company and its top executives. With the deadline approaching, those who believe they may have a valid claim should consider acting promptly to protect their interests within this legal framework.