#United States #San Francisco #Synopsys #Hagens Berman #SNPS

Synopsys, Inc. Faces Legal Challenges Following Poor Q3 Performance

In a significant legal development, Synopsys, Inc. (NASDAQ: SNPS) is currently confronting a securities fraud class action lawsuit. The case, Kim v. Synopsys, Inc., et al., No. 26-cv-09410 (N.D.CA), has been initiated by Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP. The lawsuit aims to represent investors who acquired Synopsys stocks between December 4, 2024, and September 9, 2025.

The catalyst for this legal action stems from Synopsys's latest financial report, which disclosed disappointing third-quarter results for the fiscal year 2025. The company attributed these results to declines in its Intellectual Property (IP) business—a crucial sector for its overall revenue generation. Synopsys's stock plummeted by 35%, closing at $216.59 on September 10, 2025, following the announcement, marking one of the steepest drops in its history since going public in 1992.

Background of Synopsys and Its Business Segments

Synopsys is widely recognized for providing comprehensive solutions in silicon design, IP, simulation and analysis, alongside a broad range of design services. The firm's business model is primarily divided into two segments: Design IP and Design Automation. The Design IP division has historically been noted for its robust revenue growth, often touted by the company as a result of customer reliance on Synopsys's offerings to mitigate integration risks and expedite market entry.

Allegations and Implications

The lawsuit claims that Synopsys made several misleading statements regarding its revenue growth sustainability within its Design IP business. Investors allege that crucial facts were concealed about the mounting risks associated with its customer base and the company's growth trajectory. Furthermore, it has been suggested that as Synopsys pivoted towards catering to AI customers requiring customized solutions, this shift negatively impacted the economics of their Design IP business.

The aftermath of the Q3 report revealed that Earnings Per Share (EPS) had dropped significantly to $1.50, which is a staggering 45% decrease compared to the same quarter from the previous year, as well as a 33% sequential dip. This downturn was largely attributed to an 8% revenue decline in the Design IP division compared to the prior year, putting its revenue growth strategies into question.

Investigation and Next Steps

In light of the developments, Hagens Berman is actively probing whether Synopsys indeed misled investors regarding the sustainability of its Design IP revenue. Investors who have experienced noteworthy losses during the specified period are encouraged to participate in the class action by submitting their claims to the firm. Those with pertinent information that could aid the investigation are also urged to step forward.

The deadline for lead plaintiffs to come forward is set for December 30, 2025. Synopsys's proactive approach in pivoting resources and reallocating its roadmap towards more lucrative growth opportunities will be closely scrutinized in the wake of these allegations.

The Broader Impacts of the Lawsuit

Widespread implications are likely not just for Synopsys but also for the tech sector as investors and analysts watch closely. The lawsuit serves as a reminder of the volatile nature of tech investments, especially as market conditions and technological demands shift rapidly. It underscores the importance of transparent communication between corporations and their investors—an area of focus in capital markets that will likely receive increased attention in the coming months.

As stakeholders await further developments in this case, the outcome will be pivotal in shaping future investor confidence in Synopsys and similar tech companies navigating the complexities of growth in the burgeoning AI sector.