#United States #Los Angeles #Securities Fraud #Glancy Prongay #PubMatic

Opportunity for PubMatic Shareholders

In a significant development, shareholders of PubMatic, Inc. (NASDAQ: PUBM) who have experienced financial losses have the opportunity to assume a leading role in a class action lawsuit focusing on alleged securities fraud. This legal action has been initiated by the esteemed law firm, Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, and is aimed at addressing critical concerns regarding the integrity of information provided to investors by the company.

Background of the Allegations

Between February 27, 2025, and August 11, 2025, it has been alleged that PubMatic failed to disclose critical information that significantly impacted its operations and investor confidence. Specifically, the lawsuit claims that a major demand-side platform (DSP) was transitioning numerous clients to a new platform. This transition involved different inventory evaluation methods, which resulted in decreased advertising spending and revenue for PubMatic from this key buyer.

Investors can be assured that these developments significantly affected the company’s business, operations, and growth prospects. Disclosing this information earlier could have provided a more accurate picture of the company's financial health, potentially preventing losses for numerous shareholders. According to the complaint, PubMatic's prior positive statements regarding its performance were materially misleading due to these undisclosed factors.

Legal Proceedings and Deadlines

The specific timeline for shareholders is crucial, as those affected are encouraged to participate in this ongoing lawsuit before the lead plaintiff deadline of October 20, 2025. Investment losses incurred during the specified period can qualify shareholders to be part of the class action, allowing them to seek restitution for their financial damages.

Potential participants do not need to take immediate action; they can choose to retain legal counsel or remain as absent members of the class. For anyone interested in learning more about the lawsuit, additional details can be acquired by contacting Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP directly. Their expertise in handling securities fraud class actions makes them a pivotal ally for affected investors.

How to Get Involved

To further understand the implications of this lawsuit or if you seek to participate, it is advisable to reach out to Charles Linehan, Esq., who is associated with Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP. Their office is located in Los Angeles, California, providing easy access for local shareholders as well as those from other regions who were impacted by the company's actions. Inquiries can also be made through email or phone, with the law firm maintaining a robust online presence for further communication.

Conclusion

As the legal landscape regarding securities fraud continues to evolve, this case against PubMatic serves as a critical reminder of the necessity for transparency within corporate communications. By providing affected shareholders a platform to voice their grievances and seek remedies, the lawsuit not only aims to restore investor confidence but also reinforces the fundamental principles of accountability and transparency in the business environment. Investors are strongly encouraged to consider their rights and explore the possibility of joining this class action as the timeline progresses.

• ---

For further updates and additional information regarding the lawsuit, shareholders can stay connected through the law firm’s social media channels, where they share relevant insights and updates pertaining to the case and other significant legal matters affecting investors.