Pomerantz Law Firm Files Class Action Lawsuit Against SoundHound AI, Inc.
Pomerantz LLP announced on May 26, 2025, that it has filed a class action lawsuit against SoundHound AI, Inc. (NASDAQ: SOUN) along with certain officers of the company. This lawsuit is aimed at a class of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired SoundHound securities between May 10, 2024, and March 3, 2025. The action has been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, under the docket number 25-cv-02915. The suit seeks to recover damages as a result of what has been described as multiple violations of federal securities laws.
The nature of the lawsuit stems from serious allegations concerning SoundHound's management and operational practices. According to the complaint, the company has acknowledged material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting, which have reportedly hindered its ability to effectively manage and account for corporate acquisitions. The firm disclosed that these control weaknesses were due to rapid growth and insufficient oversight of financial operations, leading to numerous challenges regarding accurate reporting of financial statements.
A key moment is the mention of two major acquisitions—SYNQ3 and Amelia Holdings, Inc.—made by SoundHound during 2024. These acquisitions aimed to bolster SoundHound's position in the voice AI industry, but the complaint alleges these transactions were improperly reported due to the company's internal control weaknesses. The plaintiffs argue that these issues have inflated SoundHound's reported financial position and misled investors regarding the company's true financial health and operational effectiveness.
The lawsuit further claims that investments made by individuals during the defined Class Period were greatly impacted by SoundHound’s misrepresentations and failures to disclose the challenges concerning its internal control and accounting practice. Such failures allegedly misled investors about the company's acquisitions and their financial implications. The complaint asserts that SoundHound overstated its capability to remediate the internal control issues and that the reported goodwill on the balance sheet was inaccurately reported, thus further complicating the company’s financial statements.
As part of the lawsuit, Pomerantz LLP is seeking an appointment as Lead Plaintiff to further represent the class. Investors who wish to join this class action have until May 27, 2025, to file their petitions. Furthermore, the firm has made available all necessary documentation and a copy of the official complaint on its website, encouraging investors to reach out for further discussion or clarification regarding the proceedings. Interested parties can contact attorney Danielle Peyton at the firm, offering another avenue for investors to discuss this significant legal matter.
This development has significant implications not only for SoundHound but also for the broader technology and AI sectors, particularly as allegations of regulatory breaches can affect investor confidence in these rapidly evolving industries. Moreover, the outcome of this case may set a precedent for how securities laws are interpreted in relation to technology firms that rely significantly on acquisitions and rapid growth strategies to enhance their market position.
As the lawsuit proceeds, all eyes will be on both the developments within SoundHound’s organizational structure and the regulatory implications of the claims laid out in court. Pomerantz LLP, recognized for its expertise in corporate and securities class action litigation, will work diligently to advocate for the rights of affected investors.
The nature of the lawsuit stems from serious allegations concerning SoundHound's management and operational practices. According to the complaint, the company has acknowledged material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting, which have reportedly hindered its ability to effectively manage and account for corporate acquisitions. The firm disclosed that these control weaknesses were due to rapid growth and insufficient oversight of financial operations, leading to numerous challenges regarding accurate reporting of financial statements.
A key moment is the mention of two major acquisitions—SYNQ3 and Amelia Holdings, Inc.—made by SoundHound during 2024. These acquisitions aimed to bolster SoundHound's position in the voice AI industry, but the complaint alleges these transactions were improperly reported due to the company's internal control weaknesses. The plaintiffs argue that these issues have inflated SoundHound's reported financial position and misled investors regarding the company's true financial health and operational effectiveness.
The lawsuit further claims that investments made by individuals during the defined Class Period were greatly impacted by SoundHound’s misrepresentations and failures to disclose the challenges concerning its internal control and accounting practice. Such failures allegedly misled investors about the company's acquisitions and their financial implications. The complaint asserts that SoundHound overstated its capability to remediate the internal control issues and that the reported goodwill on the balance sheet was inaccurately reported, thus further complicating the company’s financial statements.
As part of the lawsuit, Pomerantz LLP is seeking an appointment as Lead Plaintiff to further represent the class. Investors who wish to join this class action have until May 27, 2025, to file their petitions. Furthermore, the firm has made available all necessary documentation and a copy of the official complaint on its website, encouraging investors to reach out for further discussion or clarification regarding the proceedings. Interested parties can contact attorney Danielle Peyton at the firm, offering another avenue for investors to discuss this significant legal matter.
This development has significant implications not only for SoundHound but also for the broader technology and AI sectors, particularly as allegations of regulatory breaches can affect investor confidence in these rapidly evolving industries. Moreover, the outcome of this case may set a precedent for how securities laws are interpreted in relation to technology firms that rely significantly on acquisitions and rapid growth strategies to enhance their market position.
As the lawsuit proceeds, all eyes will be on both the developments within SoundHound’s organizational structure and the regulatory implications of the claims laid out in court. Pomerantz LLP, recognized for its expertise in corporate and securities class action litigation, will work diligently to advocate for the rights of affected investors.
Topics Financial Services & Investing）
【About Using Articles】
You can freely use the title and article content by linking to the page where the article is posted.
※ Images cannot be used.
【About Links】
Links are free to use.