Fiserv Securities Fraud Lawsuit: A Call to Action for Investors
The global investor rights law firm,
Rosen Law Firm, is making an important announcement for stockholders of
Fiserv, Inc. who purchased common shares between
July 24, 2024, and
July 22, 2025. If you found yourself investing in Fiserv during this period, you may have rights stemming from a significant securities fraud class action lawsuit under the leadership of this firm.
Key Deadlines and Next Steps
The lead plaintiff deadline for this class action lawsuit is set for
September 22, 2025. Investors who purchased Fiserv stock in the outlined period may be eligible for compensation without incurring any upfront fees. Compensation is sought through a contingency fee arrangement, meaning the law firm only gets paid if you do.
To position yourself to join this class action, you can take the following steps:
1. Visit
Rosen Legal to submit your information.
2. You may also contact Phillip Kim, Esq., directly at
866-767-3653 or via email at
[email protected] for additional guidance.
Filings for lead plaintiffs role must occur no later than September 22, 2025. A lead plaintiff represents other members of the class while guiding the course of the litigation.
Why Choose Rosen Law Firm?
Selecting competent legal counsel is crucial, particularly in complicated securities class actions. Rosen Law Firm boasts a remarkable track record, having secured the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time. The firm was ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services in total securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently remained in the top tier since then. In 2019, the firm retrieved over
$438 million for its investor clients.
Founding partner,
Laurence Rosen, has been recognized as a leading figure in the plaintiffs' bar by
Law360, underscoring the firm’s credibility in navigating complex securities cases.
Allegations Against Fiserv
The crux of the lawsuit revolves around allegations against Fiserv for making misleading statements and failing to disclose critical information that might have affected stockholder decisions. Key assertions include:
- - The misleading transition of merchants from its Payeezy platform to the Clover platform, driven by profit inefficiencies.
- - An artificial inflation of revenue and gross payment volume (GPV) attributed to this forced migration, which obscured a slowdown in new merchant engagements.
- - Reports that many merchants who transitioned to Clover encountered substantial operational difficulties, including high pricing and down-time, spurring them to revert to competitors.
- - Investors are contending that the optimistic portrayal of Clover's business strategies during the class period was misleading and did not reflect the realities.
When these true circumstances of Fiserv came to light, it resulted in a significant loss for the investors.
Additional Information
It is vital to note that a class has yet to be certified—until that occurs, you are not represented by counsel unless you've opted to retain one personally. Investors have the option to either select their counsel of choice or remain uninvolved. Your potential for recovering losses is unaffected by decisions made at this early stage.
Stay updated with ongoing developments by following Rosen Law Firm's updates on
LinkedIn,
Twitter, or
Facebook.
Disclaimer: Attorney advertising. Past outcomes do not guarantee a similar result in the future.