Pollock Cohen Achieves Crucial Judicial Wins in Voice Cloning Lawsuit Against Lovo

On July 14, 2025, Pollock Cohen LLP scored a significant victory in the class action lawsuit against Lovo, an AI technology firm, regarding the unauthorized cloning of actors' voices. The ruling, delivered by Federal Judge Paul Oetken of the Southern District of New York (SDNY), permits the plaintiffs to proceed with their claims, including breaches of contract and violations of New York's privacy regulations, among others. This judicial decision opens up avenues for actors like Paul Lehrman and Linnea Sage, who lead the charge against Lovo, alleging that their voices were replicated for commercial profit without their consent.

The case underscores the growing concern over AI's impact on intellectual property and privacy. According to the complaint, Lovo's technology has enabled numerous users to utilize cloned voices in various media formats—ranging from films and commercials to educational videos—all without compensating the original voice talents. Such practices raised vital ethical questions about consent and compensation in the era of sophisticated AI technologies. The legal team from Pollock Cohen expressed confidence in the merits of their case, highlighting the court's recognition of potential breaches of New York’s privacy laws and related statutes.

Steve Cohen, a partner at Pollock Cohen LLP, remarked, "This ruling is not only a triumph for our clients but also signals to tech companies that they must respect the rights of individuals whose voices and likenesses are exploited. We eagerly anticipate moving forward to the discovery phase and are prepared to present our case to a jury." The legal framework in place rests heavily on existing consumer protection laws, which have become crucial in ensuring that tech companies are held accountable for their actions.

Paul Lehrman, one of the plaintiffs, expressed approval regarding the decision, stating, "This powerful ruling reinforces the notion that tech companies cannot simply utilize personal data without consent. The judge's insights into the privacy and consumer protection laws of New York emphasize the robust legal tools available to fight back against such exploitation." He also acknowledged the thoughtful considerations made by the judge on previously adjudicated issues despite some rulings not aligning with their perspective.

The implications of this case extend beyond the immediate parties involved, serving as a broader commentary on the responsibilities of tech firms and their interactions with creative professionals. As the case unfolds, many within the voice acting community and beyond will closely observe how effectively the law can adapt to digital advancements and protect individual rights. This case marks a pivotal moment where artistic integrity and technological advances converge, demanding a reevaluation of old standards in the light of new technologies.

Ultimately, the outcome of this litigation could set critical precedents for the future of AI and voice acting. As the plaintiffs prepare to gather evidence and build their case for trial, the entire legal community will be watching closely to see how the court navigates the complexities of copyright and the ethical dilemmas posed by AI-driven technologies.

Topics Policy & Public Interest)

【About Using Articles】

You can freely use the title and article content by linking to the page where the article is posted.
※ Images cannot be used.

【About Links】

Links are free to use.