Experts Critique WHO for Hindering Tobacco Harm Reduction on No Tobacco Day

Global Experts Critique WHO's Stance on Tobacco Harm Reduction



In a recent gathering, an international panel of tobacco harm reduction authorities voiced their discontent regarding the World Health Organization's (WHO) approach on tobacco control, particularly in light of World No Tobacco Day. The experts pointed out the detrimental effects of the WHO's rejection of emerging harm reduction strategies, such as vaping and nicotine pouches, despite an increasing body of evidence supporting their effectiveness in aiding smokers to quit.

Representatives from Australia, South Africa, and the United Kingdom led the discussion, calling attention to how the WHO’s prohibitionist policies are not only counterproductive but are also contributing to rising smoking-related mortality rates and the expansion of illicit markets. Martin Cullip, an International Fellow at the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, highlighted the WHO's significant oversight, stating, "The WHO ignores the most vulnerable populations that face the brunt of tobacco-related harm. They dismiss adult smokers and vapers, whose experiences should inform tobacco policy."

Criticism of WHO's Policy
Pippa Starr, founder of the Australian advocacy group A.L.I.V.E. (Australia, Let's Improve Vaping Education), explicitly criticized Australia’s alarming statistics, where more than 66 individuals die daily from smoking-related illnesses. Starr attributed these grim figures partly to WHO-endorsed policies, arguing, "Rather than continue advocating for ineffective measures, the WHO should be focused on saving lives and promoting harm reduction."

Kurt Yeo, a co-founder of South Africa's Vaping Saved My Life (VSML), underscored the disconnect between WHO policies and actual public health outcomes. He pointed out that prohibition strategies have historically failed in various regions, such as Mexico, India, and Singapore, stating, "The WHO needs to acknowledge the real challenges we face. Instead of punitive policies, we require a diverse toolkit to attain a smoke-free future."

Adding to the chorus of criticism, Reem Ibrahim, Communications Manager at the UK’s Institute of Economic Affairs, illuminated the divergence between WHO's objectives and their actions: "Harm reduction is proven to work; these products facilitate smoking cessation. However, the WHO's systemic blockage of access ultimately undermines public health initiatives."

The Contradiction of WHO's Mission
Panelists expressed bewilderment at the evident contradiction in WHO's aspirations. While publicly proclaiming a mission to lower tobacco-related mortality rates, the organization simultaneously opposes science-backed alternatives that have demonstrated efficacy in assisting smokers to quit.

In light of these discussions, the experts called upon the WHO and the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Secretariat to reassess their stance. They urged these entities to adopt a more innovative outlook, recognize the voices of consumers, and embrace harm reduction as a credible strategy to combat the global smoking epidemic. By enabling access to safer alternatives and supporting evidence-based solutions, the WHO could align more closely with its mission to protect public health and save lives.

As the debate continues, the hope remains that the WHO will transform its strategies to facilitate better health outcomes for smokers worldwide, particularly as we evaluate our collective efforts on prominent occasions like World No Tobacco Day.

Topics Policy & Public Interest)

【About Using Articles】

You can freely use the title and article content by linking to the page where the article is posted.
※ Images cannot be used.

【About Links】

Links are free to use.