Friends of Science Society Challenges Canada's Climate Report Claims
In a detailed report released by the Friends of Science Society, retired energy economist Robert Lyman scrutinizes the latest findings by Environment and Climate Change Canada. Titled "Climate Monster - The Heavy Hand of Climate Regulation," Lyman's analysis argues that the current climate narratives and regulatory frameworks are based on scenarios that are not just flawed but implausible. This critique comes in light of Canada's latest update to the 2019 climate report, which media outlets have amplified, claiming an irreversible climate change trajectory.
The Friends of Science Society alludes to curious inconsistencies and anomalies in the updated report, particularly referring to its reliance on scenarios that have been officially retired by the climate science modeling community. As previously indicated in its predecessor, the 2026 report claims direct attribution of extreme weather events, such as wildfires and floods, to human-induced climate change. However, Dr. Madhav Khandekar, a seasoned veteran of Environment Canada, has previously dismantled these arguments, asserting that they lack scientific rigor.
Moreover, an article published by climate policy analyst Roger Pielke Jr. titled 'Taking Us for Fools' criticizes the unscientific methodologies utilized in weather-attribution studies. Pielke's exploration emphasizes the inherent biases when correlating recent weather events to climate change, questioning the underlying motives of such attributions.
The economic implications of climate ideology extend beyond just scientific debates and enter the realm of international trade and policy. Friends of Science Society highlights that restrictive climate regulations could potentially instigate a Canada-US trade war, especially as regulatory frameworks continue to evolve under differing political climates. They reference the Republican House Judiciary Committee report "Climate Control: Exposing the Decarbonization Collusion in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Investing," suggesting that the push for stringent climate regulations may not only impact Canadian businesses but could also escalate tensions within North American trade agreements.
Furthermore, there are concerns about how these aggressive climate policies may stifle economic growth. In a video released by the Friends of Science Society, they argue that the current administration's thrust towards implementing the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) — a climate tariff conceived by the European Union — poses significant risks to Canada’s economic health. During a time when Canada is aiming for diversification in its global markets, such tariffs threaten the very projects and trade relationships that could bolster prosperity.
The Society's analysis furthers these concerns by citing staggering opportunity costs attributed to restrictive climate policies. According to their calculations, Canada's obsession with such regulations could lead to an estimated loss of approximately $1.741 trillion from 2015 to 2025, resulting largely from canceled infrastructure projects.
In light of these assertions, the Friends of Science Society continues to emphasize its stance that climate change is fundamentally driven by solar activity rather than man-made CO2 emissions. Their ongoing projects, including upcoming online symposiums, aim to shed light on these contentious climate narratives. Notably, they are hosting a significant event on November 16, 2026, in Calgary featuring meteorologist Anthony Watts, who will discuss why the public should not fear climate change as it’s commonly portrayed.
As debates on climate regulation continue to unfold in both public and political spheres, it remains clear that the scientific community is far from a consensus on how to interpret climate data and what policies should emerge from it. As the Friends of Science Society marks its 24th anniversary, it persists in advocating for a rational and scientifically grounded approach to climate discussions, hoping to shift the narrative toward what they contend is a more accurate understanding of climate dynamics.
The Friends of Science Society alludes to curious inconsistencies and anomalies in the updated report, particularly referring to its reliance on scenarios that have been officially retired by the climate science modeling community. As previously indicated in its predecessor, the 2026 report claims direct attribution of extreme weather events, such as wildfires and floods, to human-induced climate change. However, Dr. Madhav Khandekar, a seasoned veteran of Environment Canada, has previously dismantled these arguments, asserting that they lack scientific rigor.
Moreover, an article published by climate policy analyst Roger Pielke Jr. titled 'Taking Us for Fools' criticizes the unscientific methodologies utilized in weather-attribution studies. Pielke's exploration emphasizes the inherent biases when correlating recent weather events to climate change, questioning the underlying motives of such attributions.
The economic implications of climate ideology extend beyond just scientific debates and enter the realm of international trade and policy. Friends of Science Society highlights that restrictive climate regulations could potentially instigate a Canada-US trade war, especially as regulatory frameworks continue to evolve under differing political climates. They reference the Republican House Judiciary Committee report "Climate Control: Exposing the Decarbonization Collusion in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Investing," suggesting that the push for stringent climate regulations may not only impact Canadian businesses but could also escalate tensions within North American trade agreements.
Furthermore, there are concerns about how these aggressive climate policies may stifle economic growth. In a video released by the Friends of Science Society, they argue that the current administration's thrust towards implementing the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) — a climate tariff conceived by the European Union — poses significant risks to Canada’s economic health. During a time when Canada is aiming for diversification in its global markets, such tariffs threaten the very projects and trade relationships that could bolster prosperity.
The Society's analysis furthers these concerns by citing staggering opportunity costs attributed to restrictive climate policies. According to their calculations, Canada's obsession with such regulations could lead to an estimated loss of approximately $1.741 trillion from 2015 to 2025, resulting largely from canceled infrastructure projects.
In light of these assertions, the Friends of Science Society continues to emphasize its stance that climate change is fundamentally driven by solar activity rather than man-made CO2 emissions. Their ongoing projects, including upcoming online symposiums, aim to shed light on these contentious climate narratives. Notably, they are hosting a significant event on November 16, 2026, in Calgary featuring meteorologist Anthony Watts, who will discuss why the public should not fear climate change as it’s commonly portrayed.
As debates on climate regulation continue to unfold in both public and political spheres, it remains clear that the scientific community is far from a consensus on how to interpret climate data and what policies should emerge from it. As the Friends of Science Society marks its 24th anniversary, it persists in advocating for a rational and scientifically grounded approach to climate discussions, hoping to shift the narrative toward what they contend is a more accurate understanding of climate dynamics.
Topics Policy & Public Interest）
【About Using Articles】
You can freely use the title and article content by linking to the page where the article is posted.
※ Images cannot be used.
【About Links】
Links are free to use.